Is it true that in the state of California a senior who is a US citizen is entitled to a supplemental income?

I was informed that there are cases when those naturalized citizen who have not worked in the USA receive even more than the natural born US citizen who worked and contributed to the treasury.Is it true that in the state of California a senior who is a US citizen is entitled to a supplemental income?
No, you have to be disabled too. A doctor has to say so and you have to pass a test.Is it true that in the state of California a senior who is a US citizen is entitled to a supplemental income?
You may have been told something, Jake, but I wouldn't say that you were ';informed'; - meaning you received information from an ';informed'; subject (a person providing valid information).





You are asking two different questions - one in your headline, and a different one in your narrative. To your headline question, any ';senior'; US citizen (California or otherwise) is entitled to receive a monthly income - pensions, social security, medicare, etc. are all examples of ';entitlements'; - provided they have worked long enough throughout their lifetime to qualify.





In your second question, you ask if there are cases where a naturalized citizen (a person born in another country and who immigrates legally to the US) could get more monthly income than a natural US citizen. Of course. There have to be.





Whenever a statement or question is that broad and non-specific it is almost impossible to refute. A person could legitimately ';receive'; retirement income they earned by working in their native country before they immigrated, as just one of many examples.





The people who like to keep this sort of controversy stirred up are usually people who feel that they aren't getting everything to which they think they are entitled.